Es gibt zu allem stets mindestens zwei Parteien. Da ich vor einigen Tagen meine Meinung zu Hopenhagen bereits gepostet hatte, hier sieben Gegenargumente zum Thema von uns verursachter Klimawandel…
- Anthropogenic CO2 can’t be changing climate, because CO2 is only a trace gas in the atmosphere and the amount produced by humans is dwarfed by the amount from volcanoes and other natural sources.
- The alleged „hockey stick“ graph of temperatures over the past 1,600 years has been disproved. It doesn’t even acknowledge the existence of a „medieval warm period“ around 1000 A.D. that was hotter than today is.
- Global warming stopped a decade ago; the earth has been cooling since then.
- The sun or cosmic rays are much more likely to be the real causes of global warming.
- Climatologists conspire to hide the truth about global warming by locking away their data. Their so-called „consensus“ on global warming is scientifically irrelevant because science isn’t settled by popularity.
- Climatologists have a vested interest in raising the alarm because it brings them money and prestige.
- Technological fixes, such as inventing energy sources that don’t produce CO2 or geoengineering the climate, would be more affordable, prudent ways to address climate change than reducing our carbon footprint.
Was man nun glauben soll? Keine Ahnung. Wir leben generell zu verschwenderisch und das aus dem einfachen Grund: weil wir es können. Ob das gut ist lasse ich einfach mal im Raum stehen. Ich gebe weiterhin mein Bestes mich sparsam zu zeigen. Falls es mir die Natur nicht dankt, dann wenigstens mein Geldbeutel.
via Boing Boing































kommentiert